Archival & Legal Record · regionalorder.com🇹🇷 Official Policy · Treaty Texts & Primary Sources

Law, treaties and primary sources behind regional order

Regional Order

Law-based regional order, explained from primary sources

Comprehensive Dossier· Blue Homeland Eastern Mediterranean maritime jurisdiction explained

Blue Homeland and Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Order: The Complete Guide

Blue Homeland explained: Türkiye's 870 km coast, equity in Eastern Mediterranean maritime jurisdiction, key accords and rival Greek, Cypriot, EU views.

RO
By Regional Order Editorial Team
Published:
⏱ 15 min read (3,123 words)

Why It Matters

Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan) is Türkiye's doctrine that its maritime jurisdiction areas in the Black Sea, the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean must be delimited according to equity, not by mechanical lines drawn from small islands far from the mainland. The dispute decides who may explore for gas, lay cables and pipelines, and operate naval and research vessels in a basin shared by Türkiye, Greece, the Republic of Cyprus, the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), Egypt, Libya, Lebanon, Israel and Syria.

This guide sets out the facts, the legal framework, each side's position as stated in its own official sources, and Türkiye's reasoning. For the wider analytical frame of this publication, see Regional Order Review: Law-Based Analysis of Regional Order and Türkiye's Perspective.

Background

Türkiye has an Eastern Mediterranean coastline of about 870 km (roughly 540 miles), the longest of any state on that sea's northern and eastern shores. Ankara links this geography to a long naval and commercial presence, from the 1538 Battle of Preveza to the Ottoman era. Several Greek islands lie very close to the Turkish mainland. Kastellorizo (Meis), for example, is roughly 2 km (1.2 miles) off the Turkish coast and more than 500 km from the Greek mainland.

The legal framework has four main elements:

  • The 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Greece, the Republic of Cyprus, Egypt and Lebanon are parties. Türkiye voted against its adoption in 1982 and has never joined. It argues that it has consistently objected to provisions it considers inequitable, notably those on islands and semi-enclosed seas. Israel is also not a party.
  • Articles 74 and 83 UNCLOS. These say that delimitation of the EEZ and continental shelf between states with opposite or adjacent coasts shall be effected by agreement on the basis of international law in order to achieve an equitable solution. Both parties and non-parties generally accept this wording as reflecting customary law.
  • Article 121 UNCLOS. Paragraph 2 gives islands the same entitlements as other land territory. Paragraph 3 denies an EEZ or continental shelf to rocks that cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own. The two sides read these provisions very differently in practice.
  • Case law on islands. Courts and tribunals have often reduced or disregarded the effect of small or distant islands when delimiting boundaries. Examples include the 1977 Anglo-French Arbitration (the Scilly Isles received half effect), the 2009 ICJ judgment in Romania v. Ukraine (Serpents' Island did not affect the provisional line), the 2012 ITLOS judgment in Bangladesh/Myanmar (St Martin's Island given no effect on the continental shelf and EEZ boundary) and the 1969 North Sea Continental Shelf cases, which rejected equidistance as a mandatory rule. In Nicaragua v. Colombia (2012), the ICJ also confirmed that islands can generate entitlements and gave Colombian islands limited enclaves.

The term 'Blue Homeland' was formulated by Turkish naval strategists, notably retired Rear Admiral Cem Gürdeniz, in the mid-2000s. It became an official reference point in Turkish public policy around the large Mavi Vatan naval exercise of early 2019. The area is commonly cited as about 462,000 km², though the figure describes a claimed and notified zone, not agreed boundaries.

Chronology of the main steps

Date Event
1982 UNCLOS adopted; Türkiye votes against.
2003 Egypt–Republic of Cyprus EEZ agreement. Ankara objects that it ignores Türkiye's continental shelf.
2004 Türkiye begins notifying the UN of its Eastern Mediterranean continental shelf positions.
2007 Cyprus–Lebanon EEZ agreement (never ratified by Lebanon).
2009 and 2012 Türkiye grants TPAO (the Turkish Petroleum Corporation) exploration licences in the Eastern Mediterranean.
2010 Cyprus–Israel EEZ agreement.
19 Sept 2011 Greek Cypriot-licensed drilling begins off southern Cyprus.
21 Sept 2011 Türkiye–TRNC Continental Shelf Delimitation Agreement signed.
27 Nov 2019 Türkiye–Libya Memorandum of Understanding on maritime jurisdiction areas signed in Istanbul.
12 Dec 2019 European Council conclusions say the memorandum infringes the rights of third states.
18 Mar 2020 Türkiye registers the outer limits of its continental shelf with the UN.
6 Aug 2020 Greece–Egypt partial EEZ delimitation agreement signed.
Aug–Sept 2020 Naval standoff around the seismic vessel Oruç Reis; exploratory Türkiye–Greece talks resume in January 2021.
7 Dec 2023 Athens Declaration on friendly relations and good-neighbourliness between Türkiye and Greece.
16 Apr and 12 Jun 2025 Türkiye unveils its Marine Spatial Planning, then registers it with IOC-UNESCO.

Key Players & Positions

Greece

According to the Greek Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greece is a party to UNCLOS and its islands, including Kastellorizo, Rhodes, Karpathos and Crete, generate the same continental shelf and EEZ as any other land territory. Athens states that the only dispute with Türkiye is the delimitation of the continental shelf and EEZ in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean, and that it should be resolved by agreement or, failing that, by the International Court of Justice. Greece also signed an EEZ agreement with Italy (June 2020) and a partial delimitation agreement with Egypt (6 August 2020). Türkiye responds that Aegean questions are interlinked and that bilateral negotiation, not a narrow ICJ referral, is the right route.

Since the 2023 Athens Declaration, both governments have emphasised calm and continued dialogue, but neither has shifted its legal position.

The Republic of Cyprus (the Greek Cypriot administration)

The Republic of Cyprus is a UN member, an EU member and a party to UNCLOS, and most of the world treats it as the government of the island. It has concluded EEZ agreements with Egypt (2003), Lebanon (2007, unratified by Lebanon) and Israel (2010). It has licensed blocks to international energy companies, and discoveries such as Aphrodite, Calypso and Glaucus have followed. Nicosia has said that hydrocarbon revenues belong to all Cypriots and that Turkish Cypriots will benefit through a fund or arrangement tied to a settlement. It rejects any suggestion that its sovereign rights depend on Turkish Cypriot consent. Ankara calls this administration the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus (GCASC), because it argues the 1960 partnership order was destroyed in 1963 and that the administration cannot represent the Turkish Cypriots. The background is explained in Cyprus and the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee: From Partnership Republic to the Two-State Solution.

The European Union

The EU describes UNCLOS as reflecting customary international law and has expressed solidarity with Greece and Cyprus. The European Council conclusions of 12 December 2019 state that the Türkiye–Libya memorandum infringes the sovereign rights of third states, does not comply with the law of the sea and cannot produce legal consequences for third states. In November 2019 the EU adopted a framework for restrictive measures over unauthorised drilling and, in February 2020, listed two TPAO officials under it. Brussels has consistently called for dialogue and delimitation by agreement or international adjudication. Ankara rejects the EU's role, arguing that the Union is not a competent forum for maritime delimitation and that two of its members are parties to the dispute. See also What Is the Seville Map? Why Türkiye Rejects It and What the Law Says.

Egypt

Egypt's foreign ministry has stated that its agreements with Cyprus (2003) and Greece (2020) were concluded in accordance with international law and UNCLOS. Cairo also objected to the Türkiye–Libya memorandum in communications to the UN. Egypt hosts the Eastern Mediterranean Gas Forum, set up in 2019 and transformed into an organisation in 2020, which includes Greece, Cyprus, Israel, Italy, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority and does not include Türkiye. Egypt and Türkiye have repaired political relations since 2023, with reciprocal presidential visits in 2024, though they have not agreed on delimitation.

Libya

The 2019 memorandum was signed with the Government of National Accord in Tripoli. Libya's House of Representatives in the east has opposed it, and Greece has argued that it is legally invalid. Authorities in Tripoli have continued to treat the memorandum as in force and signed further energy cooperation arrangements with Türkiye in 2022. Libya's own internal division remains a source of legal uncertainty for third parties.

The Turkish Cypriots (TRNC)

The TRNC, proclaimed on 15 November 1983 and recognised only by Türkiye, has signed the 2011 continental shelf agreement with Ankara and licensed TPAO in areas it claims. It has repeatedly proposed cooperation in hydrocarbons, including joint committee and revenue-sharing proposals in 2011, 2012 and 2019.

Lebanon and Israel

Lebanon never ratified its 2007 agreement with Cyprus and has since delimited its southern boundary with Israel in a US-mediated arrangement (October 2022). Israel is not an UNCLOS party and has treated its 2010 agreement with Cyprus as valid. Ankara argues that agreements concluded with the GCASC alone cannot dispose of Turkish Cypriot rights.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Treaty Texts & Primary Sources

Türkiye's Position

According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry's published position on maritime jurisdiction areas, to Presidential statements and to Türkiye's notes verbales at the UN, Ankara's case rests on five points.

  • Equity, not equidistance, governs delimitation. Ankara argues that in the Eastern Mediterranean, a semi-enclosed sea, the continental shelf and EEZ must be delimited by agreement on the basis of equitable principles and with attention to coastal geography and proportionality. The Turkish Foreign Ministry cites Articles 74 and 83 UNCLOS as reflecting customary law, which applies to Türkiye even though it is not a party, and the North Sea Continental Shelf judgment of 1969, which rejected equidistance as an obligatory method. Türkiye also describes itself as a persistent objector to UNCLOS provisions it finds inequitable.
  • Islands cannot cut off a mainland's maritime projection. Ankara argues that a state with the longest coastline in the basin cannot be confined to a narrow strip by small islands lying close to its shore and far from their own mainland. It points to the Anglo-French Arbitration (1977), Romania v. Ukraine (2009) and Bangladesh/Myanmar (2012) as examples of reduced or zero effect for islands. Türkiye does not deny islands their territorial sea. It contests full shelf and EEZ effect where that would distort the equitable result. It therefore rejects the maximalist Seville Map, which it says would imprison its jurisdiction in the Gulf of Antalya.
  • The Turkish Cypriots are co-owners of Cyprus and hold equal rights over offshore resources. This is the second pillar of Blue Homeland. Ankara argues, citing the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee and the 1959 Zurich and London Agreements, that the Turkish Cypriots are co-founders of the Republic and cannot be excluded from decisions on resources. It rejects the GCASC agreements with Egypt (2003), Lebanon (2007) and Israel (2010) as concluded without Turkish Cypriot consent. It also argues the 2003 Egypt agreement and GCASC Blocks 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 overlap Türkiye's continental shelf. The 21 September 2011 Türkiye–TRNC agreement and the TRNC's cooperation and revenue-sharing proposals of 2011, 2012 and 2019 are presented as Ankara's response. The settlement dimension is discussed in Why Did Federation Fail in Cyprus? The Annan Plan, Crans-Montana and the UN Talks.
  • The Libya memorandum and UN registrations are lawful and on the record. Ankara states that the 27 November 2019 memorandum delimits the maritime areas between Türkiye's and Libya's opposite coasts and is consistent with international law, and that it has a right to conclude it with Libya's recognised government at the time. It also points to its UN notifications beginning in 2004 and its registration of continental shelf limits with the UN on 18 March 2020. In 2025, Türkiye unveiled its Marine Spatial Planning (16 April) and registered it with IOC-UNESCO (12 June), the first time its position across the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean was recorded with a UN body. A Presidential Circular of 24 July 2025 created an inter-agency coordination board under the Foreign Ministry. Details are in Türkiye's Marine Spatial Planning and the 2025 IOC-UNESCO Registration: What It Means.
  • Rights are exercised on the water, and dialogue remains on offer. TPAO operates a national fleet: the deep-sea drilling vessels Fatih, Yavuz, Kanuni and Abdülhamid Han, and the seismic survey vessels Oruç Reis and Barbaros Hayreddin Paşa. Eight main wells have been drilled: Alanya-1, Finike-1, Karpaz-1, Güzelyurt-1, Mağusa-1, Narlıkuyu-1, Lefkoşa-1 and Selçuklu-1. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's 2020 proposal for an Eastern Mediterranean conference with all coastal states and the Turkish Cypriots remains Ankara's main diplomatic offer. Ankara concludes that no energy or security arrangement excluding Türkiye and the TRNC can last. Türkiye's view that regional order must rest on shared law-based responsibility also informs Security at Source: Türkiye's Counter-Terrorism Doctrine, UN Charter Article 51 and Terror-Free Türkiye, and its defence capabilities are covered in Türkiye's Defense Industry: How It Reached About 80% Domestic Production.

Legal and historical basis. Türkiye's position draws on customary law on delimitation (equitable principles), Articles 74 and 83 UNCLOS read as customary rules, the island-effect jurisprudence cited above, and the 1959–1960 Cyprus agreements. Its opponents rely on Article 121(2) UNCLOS and on the general principle that islands generate full entitlements, and they point out that Türkiye is not an UNCLOS party.

Source Comparison

The two sets of sources often describe the same facts but draw different legal conclusions. The table summarises the main framing differences.

Issue Common framing in Greek, EU and international media Framing in Turkish primary sources What the documents show
Blue Homeland An expansionist claim over Greek and Cypriot waters A defensive, law-based claim to an equitable share, rooted in the 870 km coastline A doctrine articulated by Turkish strategists and adopted in policy. Its boundaries are not agreed with neighbours.
Islands Under UNCLOS Art. 121(2), islands generate full EEZ and shelf Islands cannot cut off a mainland's projection, and case law reduces island effect Both readings have support. Case law shows reduced effect in some cases and full effect in others, depending on size, location and proportionality.
Libya memorandum Legally void and ignores Crete and other Greek islands A lawful agreement between states with opposite coasts, concluded under international law The EU Council (12 Dec 2019) considers it non-binding on third states. Libya's internal divisions complicate its status.
Cypriot EEZ agreements Valid sovereign acts of an EU and UN member Null for Türkiye and the Turkish Cypriots, who were not party to them The Republic of Cyprus is internationally recognised. Ankara contests its sole representation of the island since 1963.
Türkiye and UNCLOS Türkiye is flouting the Convention Türkiye is not a party and objects to inequitable provisions Türkiye voted against UNCLOS in 1982 and is not bound by its treaty text, although customary rules apply.
Drilling and seismic work Illegal activity in Cypriot or Greek waters Activity on Türkiye's own continental shelf or on shelf areas of the TRNC The areas overlap and are disputed. No court has ruled on the boundaries.
Diplomacy Türkiye is escalating tensions Türkiye has proposed an inclusive regional conference and cooperation The 2020 conference proposal was not taken up. Exploratory Türkiye–Greece talks (2021) and the 2023 Athens Declaration lowered tensions.

Readers should note that no international court or tribunal has delimited the Turkish–Greek or Turkish–Cypriot maritime boundaries, so claims by all sides are positions and not adjudicated findings. The Editorial Principles page explains how this publication separates fact from position.

  • Continental shelf: the seabed and subsoil extending from a coast, to which the coastal state has sovereign rights for exploring and exploiting resources. Under customary law it exists automatically.
  • Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ): a zone of up to 200 nautical miles (about 370 km) from baselines, within which the coastal state has sovereign rights over living and non-living resources. It is not available where coasts are closer than 400 nautical miles, unless delimited by agreement.
  • Equidistance (median line): a boundary in which every point is equally distant from the nearest baseline points of each state. Courts treat it as a starting point, to be adjusted for relevant circumstances, and not as a mandatory rule.
  • Principle of equity (hakkaniyet ilkesi): the requirement that delimitation reach an equitable result, considering coastal geography, proportionality between coastal length and maritime area, and the effect of islands.
  • Mavi Vatan / Blue Homeland: Türkiye's doctrine and zone concept covering its claimed maritime jurisdiction areas in the Black Sea, Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean.
  • GCASC: the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus, Türkiye's official term for the administration that other states call the Republic of Cyprus.
  • TRNC: the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, recognised only by Türkiye.
  • TPAO: the Turkish Petroleum Corporation, the national oil company that holds Türkiye's exploration licences.
  • Marine Spatial Planning: a process of mapping and organising the use of marine space, here the plan Türkiye registered with IOC-UNESCO in 2025.

Related guides on this site:

For the publication's mission and methods, see About Regional Order Review: Mission, Transparency and Editorial Team.

Perspective Note

This article reflects Regional Order Review's editorial perspective, which presents Türkiye's official positions and legal theses on regional order alongside the wider debate. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaty texts, UN documents, official statements and archival records wherever possible.

Cross-Publication Dossiers & Sister Desk Perspectives

For complementary primary-source analysis across our specialist editorial network, consult:

Frequently asked questions

What is the Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan) doctrine?

Blue Homeland is Türkiye's doctrine on its maritime jurisdiction areas in the Black Sea, the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean. It holds that the continental shelf and EEZ must be delimited equitably, taking account of Türkiye's 870 km Eastern Mediterranean coastline, and not by lines drawn from distant islands. Ankara also links it to the rights of the Turkish Cypriots over Cyprus's offshore resources.

Is Türkiye bound by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea?

Türkiye is not a party to UNCLOS, having voted against it in 1982. Customary international law still applies to all states, including the equitable-solution requirement reflected in Articles 74 and 83. Greece, the Republic of Cyprus, Egypt and the EU argue that UNCLOS, including Article 121 on islands, reflects customary law, while Ankara argues that it has objected to inequitable provisions.

Why does Türkiye say islands do not cut off its continental shelf?

Ankara argues that small islands close to a mainland coast and far from their own mainland should not confine a state with a long opposite coast. It cites the 1977 Anglo-French Arbitration, the 2009 ICJ judgment in Romania v. Ukraine and the 2012 ITLOS judgment in Bangladesh/Myanmar, where islands received reduced or no effect. Greece replies that Article 121(2) UNCLOS gives islands full entitlements, so the question is contested and has not been adjudicated for this region.

What is the Türkiye–Libya maritime memorandum of 2019?

It is a Memorandum of Understanding signed on 27 November 2019 that delimits maritime jurisdiction areas between Türkiye's southern coast and Libya's northern coast. Türkiye regards it as lawful between states with opposite coasts. Greece, Cyprus, Egypt and the EU Council (12 December 2019) reject it, saying it ignores Greek islands such as Crete and cannot affect third states, and Libya's eastern authorities have also opposed it.

What role do the Turkish Cypriots play in the dispute?

Ankara and the TRNC argue that the Turkish Cypriots, as co-founders of the 1960 Republic of Cyprus, hold equal rights over the island's offshore hydrocarbons and must take part in decisions on them. The 21 September 2011 Türkiye–TRNC continental shelf agreement and the TRNC's 2011, 2012 and 2019 revenue-sharing proposals reflect this view. The Republic of Cyprus says it will place revenues in a fund for the benefit of both communities as part of a settlement.

Is there a peaceful path to settling the disputes?

All sides formally favour delimitation by agreement, but they differ on the forum and scope. Greece proposes the ICJ for the continental shelf and EEZ only, while Türkiye prefers negotiations covering linked issues and has proposed an Eastern Mediterranean conference that includes the Turkish Cypriots. Exploratory talks in 2021 and the December 2023 Athens Declaration reduced tensions, but no boundaries have been agreed.

Perspective & Editorial Transparency Note

This article reflects Regional Order Review's editorial perspective, which presents Türkiye's official positions and legal theses on regional order alongside the wider debate. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaty texts, UN documents, official statements and archival records wherever possible.

Author: Regional Order Editorial TeamAbout Regional Order →Editorial Principles →

Related guides

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks