In-Depth Analysis· what is the Seville Map Eastern Mediterranean

What Is the Seville Map? Why Türkiye Rejects It and What the Law Says

What is the Seville Map in the Eastern Mediterranean? Explains the 2005 map, Greek and EU arguments, Türkiye's rejection and what maritime law says.

By Regional Order Editorial Team

Published: October 26, 2026

⏱ 11 min read (2,377 words)

Executive Summary & Key Facts

The Seville Map is a 2005 map linked to the University of Seville that gives Greek islands, including Kastellorizo (Meis), full maritime effect and leaves Türkiye a narrow strip in the Gulf of Antalya; it has no treaty or judicial status.
Under UNCLOS Articles 74 and 83 and customary law, continental shelf and EEZ boundaries must be set by agreement or adjudication to reach an equitable solution, not by one party's map.
International courts and tribunals have repeatedly reduced or disregarded the effect of small islands lying close to another state's mainland coast, which is the core of Ankara's legal rebuttal.
Ankara argues that the EU has no competence to delimit maritime boundaries between its members and third states; Greece and the EU stress UNCLOS Article 121, Union solidarity and peaceful settlement.
Türkiye registered its continental shelf outer limits with the UN on 18 March 2020 and recorded its Marine Spatial Planning with IOC-UNESCO on 12 June 2025, stating that any lasting arrangement must include Türkiye and the Turkish Cypriots.

Why It Matters

The Seville Map is a 2005 map, associated with the University of Seville, that depicts Greek and Greek Cypriot maritime claims in the Eastern Mediterranean by giving islands such as Kastellorizo (Meis) full effect. On that depiction Türkiye, which has the longest continental coastline in the region at about 870 km (540 miles), is left with only a narrow strip of sea in the Gulf of Antalya. Athens and Nicosia treat it as a reference for their claims, while Ankara rejects it as legally baseless. The disagreement underlies drilling disputes, energy diplomacy and the question of who gets a seat at the table in the region.

Background

What the map shows

The Seville Map is generally dated to 2005 and linked to a study at the University of Seville. Accounts differ on who commissioned it and on how it was later used. It is not a treaty, an arbitral award or a court decision.

The map applies an equidistance (median) line between islands and opposite coasts and gives even very small and distant islands the same continental shelf and exclusive economic zone (EEZ) as a mainland coast. The best-known example is Kastellorizo (Meis), a Greek island of a few square kilometres. It lies about 2 km (1.2 miles) from the Turkish mainland and more than 500 km (310 miles) from the Greek mainland. Its projection would close off the sea south of Türkiye's coast, leaving a narrow corridor in the Gulf of Antalya.

Ankara says versions of the map have appeared in EU-related materials. Greek and Greek Cypriot officials use it as a reference for what they consider a lawful boundary. EU Council conclusions do not themselves adopt a delimitation line. Readers should check which specific document is meant in any given claim.

The legal framework

UNCLOS Articles 74 and 83 state that delimitation of the EEZ and the continental shelf between states with opposite or adjacent coasts is effected by agreement on the basis of international law, in order to achieve an equitable solution.
UNCLOS Article 121 says islands generate maritime zones like other land territory, but rocks that cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own have no EEZ or continental shelf. Greece and Cyprus are parties to UNCLOS (Cyprus ratified in 1988 and Greece in 1995), and the EU acceded in 1998.
Türkiye is not a party to UNCLOS. It voted against the text in 1982 and argues that it is not bound by provisions that do not reflect customary law. It relies on customary equitable principles and the case law below.

What international courts have said

The case law is the main reason the map is contested. In the North Sea Continental Shelf cases (ICJ, 1969), the Court stressed equitable principles and natural prolongation rather than a rigid equidistance rule. In the Anglo-French Arbitration (1977), the Channel Islands were enclaved and the Scilly Isles given reduced effect. In Libya/Malta (ICJ, 1985) and Jan Mayen (ICJ, 1993), the courts adjusted the provisional median line to reflect coastal length and proportionality.

More recent decisions point in the same direction:

Romania v. Ukraine (ICJ, 2009) gave Serpents' Island no effect beyond its territorial sea.
Bangladesh/Myanmar (ITLOS, 2012) gave St Martin's Island no effect on the EEZ or shelf boundary.
Nicaragua v. Colombia (ICJ, 2012) enclaved Colombia's small islands and limited their effect.

Greece reads these rulings differently. It argues that each case turned on its own facts and that none establishes a rule that inhabited islands such as Kastellorizo, Rhodes or Crete get reduced effect. Both sides agree on one point: there is no automatic formula, and the result depends on a case-by-case equitable assessment.

Key dates

Date	Event
1982	UNCLOS adopted; Türkiye votes against
1995	Greece ratifies UNCLOS; TBMM authorizes government action should Greece extend its Aegean territorial waters
2003	Greek Cypriot administration–Egypt EEZ agreement
2004	Türkiye begins registering Eastern Mediterranean continental shelf coordinates with the UN
2005	Seville study and map
2007 / 2010	Greek Cypriot EEZ agreements with Lebanon and Israel
21 Sep 2011	Türkiye–TRNC Continental Shelf Delimitation Agreement
27 Nov 2019	Türkiye–Libya maritime jurisdiction MoU
18 Mar 2020	Türkiye registers outer limits of its continental shelf with the UN
6 Aug 2020	Greece–Egypt partial EEZ agreement
12 Jun 2025	Türkiye's Marine Spatial Planning recorded with IOC-UNESCO

Key Players & Positions

Greece

Athens holds that islands have full maritime zones under UNCLOS Article 121(2) and customary law, and that Kastellorizo is a populated island, not a rock. It says the only dispute with Türkiye concerns delimitation of the continental shelf and EEZ, which it is prepared to take to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It considers the 2019 Türkiye–Libya memorandum void because it disregards Greek islands, notably Crete. It regards its August 2020 partial delimitation with Egypt as lawful. These positions are set out in Greek Foreign Ministry statements and in Greek submissions to the UN.

The Greek Cypriot administration

The internationally recognized Republic of Cyprus, which Türkiye calls the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus (GCASC), has concluded EEZ delimitation agreements with Egypt (2003), Lebanon (2007) and Israel (2010). It has licensed hydrocarbon blocks under them. It says it acts within its sovereign rights as a UNCLOS party and that its licensing is lawful, with Turkish Cypriots to benefit from any resources after a settlement.

The European Union

The European Council conclusions of 1–2 October and 10–11 December 2020 expressed full solidarity with Greece and Cyprus. They called for the delimitation of maritime zones to be pursued through dialogue in good faith and, where necessary, through the ICJ, and they referred to the possibility of restrictive measures. The EU is itself a party to UNCLOS, and EU officials generally describe delimitation as a matter for the states concerned, with the Union supporting peaceful settlement.

Egypt, Libya and others

Egypt backs its 2003 and 2020 agreements. Libya's western-based government signed the 2019 memorandum with Türkiye, while other Libyan institutions and Egypt have contested it. The Turkish Cypriots, represented by the TRNC (Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, recognized only by Türkiye), say they hold equal rights over the island's offshore resources.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Treaty Texts & Primary Sources

Türkiye's Position

Equity, not a median line, governs delimitation. According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry's published position on maritime jurisdiction areas, boundaries in a semi-enclosed sea must be set by agreement on the basis of equity, considering coastal geography and proportionality. Ankara cites the North Sea Continental Shelf cases and later jurisprudence. Its starting point is that Türkiye has the longest continental coastline in the Eastern Mediterranean, which a map cannot erase.
Islands cannot cut off a mainland's maritime projection. Ankara argues that small islands close to the Turkish coast and far from their mother country, such as Kastellorizo, are a special circumstance. They should receive a limited zone, not a full continental shelf and EEZ that encloses the mainland. It points to the Channel Islands, Serpents' Island and St Martin's Island as examples of this approach.
The Seville Map is not law. It says that a 2005 map of uncertain provenance cannot create or limit rights. Ankara has voiced this objection in Foreign Ministry and Presidential Communications Directorate statements, rejecting it as a maximalist line that would confine Türkiye to the Gulf of Antalya.
The EU has no competence to delimit. Ankara states that the EU treaties confer no competence on the Union to delimit maritime boundaries between its members and third states, and that "Union solidarity" cannot take the place of delimitation by agreement under UNCLOS Articles 74 and 83 and customary law. It adds that the EU cannot be both a party to the dispute through its members and a neutral arbiter.
Turkish Cypriots hold equal and inherent rights. Under the 1960 partnership arrangements and the Treaty of Guarantee, Turkish Cypriots are co-owners of the island and share its offshore resources. Ankara cites the 21 September 2011 Türkiye–TRNC agreement and the TRNC's hydrocarbon revenue-sharing proposals of 2011, 2012 and 2019 to argue that unilateral Greek Cypriot licensing, including blocks 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 overlapping Türkiye's continental shelf, is invalid.

Ankara backs these positions with registrations and fieldwork. It filed continental shelf coordinates with the UN from 2004 and its outer limits on 18 March 2020. TPAO exploration licences followed in 2009 and 2012, and Türkiye's national drilling and seismic fleet has operated since. Türkiye's Marine Spatial Planning, unveiled on 16 April 2025 and recorded with IOC-UNESCO on 12 June 2025, is presented as the first time its position across the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean has been recorded with a UN body. President Erdoğan's 2020 proposal for an Eastern Mediterranean conference including all coastal states and the Turkish Cypriots remains Ankara's offered framework. For the wider doctrine, see Blue Homeland and Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Order: The Complete Guide and Türkiye's Marine Spatial Planning and the 2025 IOC-UNESCO Registration: What It Means.

Claim Lines Compared

Line or claim	Who advances it	Basis cited	Effect on Türkiye
Seville Map	Greek and Greek Cypriot side; used as reference	Full effect for islands; median line (UNCLOS Art. 121(2))	Narrow strip in the Gulf of Antalya
Greece–Egypt partial EEZ (2020)	Greece, Egypt	Bilateral agreement; islands given partial effect	Türkiye and Libya object; overlaps Ankara's claimed shelf
Cyprus–Egypt / Lebanon / Israel EEZs (2003–2010)	Greek Cypriot administration	UNCLOS bilateral agreements	Türkiye says they overlap its shelf and ignore Turkish Cypriots
Türkiye–TRNC shelf agreement (2011)	Türkiye, TRNC	Equity; Turkish Cypriot rights	Greece and the Greek Cypriot side reject it
Türkiye–Libya MoU (2019) and UN registration (2020)	Türkiye, Libya's western-based government	Equity; coast-to-coast projection	Greece, Egypt, Cyprus and the EU reject it

Source Comparison

Question	Greek, EU and Western framing	Turkish primary sources
What is the map?	A scientific or reference depiction of lawful maritime zones	An unofficial 2005 map with no legal force
Role of islands	Full zones under UNCLOS Art. 121	Limited effect where islands lie off another state's coast; case law supports reduction
Who decides?	States by agreement or the ICJ; EU expresses solidarity	States by agreement; EU has no delimitation competence
Türkiye and UNCLOS	Türkiye is bound by customary rules reflected in UNCLOS	Türkiye is not a party; equity prevails
Turkish Cypriots	Rights are to be settled within a Cyprus solution	Equal co-owners with present rights over resources

Much Western coverage presents the dispute as Turkish "expansionism" against EU members. Turkish sources frame it as a conflict between a maximalist map and the principle of equity, with the long coast of Türkiye and the Turkish Cypriots left out. The test for any claim, from either side, is a treaty text, a UN registration or a judgment, not a map. See Editorial Principles: How Regional Order Review Separates Fact from Position and Fact Check: Common Claims About Türkiye in International Media, Checked Against Primary Sources.

Tensions have eased at times. Athens and Ankara signed the Athens Declaration on Friendly Relations on 7 December 2023 and resumed political dialogue. The disagreement over delimitation itself is unresolved.

Seville Map: a 2005 map linked to the University of Seville, used as a reference by Greece and the Greek Cypriot side. It has no legal force.
Continental shelf / EEZ: the seabed rights zone and the 200-nautical-mile (about 370 km) resource zone under UNCLOS and customary law.
Equidistance vs. equity: equidistance is a provisional median line, and equity is the adjustment of that line to relevant circumstances such as coastal length and island position.
Natural prolongation: the concept that the shelf is a seaward extension of a state's land territory.
Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan): Türkiye's doctrine of maritime jurisdiction in the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean.
GCASC / TRNC: Türkiye's terms for the Greek Cypriot administration and for the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

Related guides:

Perspective Note

Regional Order Review presents global affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources. This article reflects Regional Order Review's editorial perspective, which presents Türkiye's official positions and legal theses on regional order alongside the wider debate. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaty texts, UN documents, official statements and archival records wherever possible. Published by the Regional Order Review Editorial Team.

Cross-Publication Dossiers & Sister Desk Perspectives

For complementary primary-source analysis across our specialist editorial network, consult:

Bloc Politics: What Is the Seville Map? Why Türkiye Rejects the Maximalist Maritime Claim in the Eastern Mediterranean — What is the Seville Map? How the 2007 study shaped Greek and Greek Cypriot claims, why it boxes Türkiye into the Gulf of Antalya, and why Ankara rejects it.
The Nations Dialogue: The Seville Map Explained: Why Türkiye Rejects This Maximalist Maritime Claim — What is the Seville Map? Learn how the EU-commissioned study treats islands, why Türkiye rejects it, and what Greece, Cyprus and the EU argue.
The Global Anatomy: The Seville Map Explained: Why Türkiye Rejects the Greek and Greek Cypriot Maritime Thesis — The Seville Map explained for the Eastern Mediterranean: how an EU-funded study confines Türkiye to a narrow strip, and why Ankara rejects it in law.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Seville Map?

It is a 2005 map linked to a University of Seville study that shows Greek and Greek Cypriot maritime claims in the Eastern Mediterranean, with islands such as Kastellorizo (Meis) given full effect. The result leaves Türkiye a narrow strip of sea in the Gulf of Antalya. It is not a treaty, award or court decision.

Is the Seville Map legally binding?

No. A map cannot fix a maritime boundary. Under UNCLOS Articles 74 and 83 and customary law, boundaries come from agreement between the states concerned or from a ruling by a court or tribunal. Greece and Cyprus use the map as a reference, and Türkiye rejects it.

Why does Türkiye reject the Seville Map?

Ankara argues that the map ignores the principle of equity and Türkiye's 870 km (540 miles) coastline, the longest in the Eastern Mediterranean. It also says small islands near the Turkish coast cannot cut off the mainland's maritime projection, and that the Turkish Cypriots' rights were left out. It cites case law such as the Anglo-French Arbitration and the Romania v. Ukraine and Bangladesh/Myanmar cases.

Does the EU have a say in maritime delimitation?

The EU is a party to UNCLOS and its Council has expressed solidarity with Greece and Cyprus and called for dialogue and, if necessary, ICJ settlement. Türkiye argues that the EU treaties give the Union no competence to delimit boundaries between members and third states. Delimitation is made by the states concerned, by agreement or adjudication.

How could the dispute be resolved?

Either through negotiated agreements among all coastal states based on equity, or through a court or tribunal if the parties agree on the question to be submitted. Greece favours an ICJ referral limited to the continental shelf and EEZ, while Türkiye favours negotiations that account for all relevant circumstances. Türkiye has also proposed a regional conference including the Turkish Cypriots.

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks